After hours of engaging the student
body of a major US university on the issue of abortion and the value
of human life, a young man who had previously been coming after me pretty hard held back and waited to talk alone. His demeanor had noticeably changed and he
asked just one question. “Why are you a Christian?”
The answer I offered him is the only
answer I can think of that makes any sense. “Because I
believe it is the truth.”
I understand
the emotional issues discussed in Brian McLaren's piece at The Huffington Post (
Why We're Leaving the Church: A Report from the Nones) on why young people are leaving the church. This phenomenon is a preoccupation for me and my friends working in Christian apologetics. Students, parents, and friends frequently share their struggles regarding their faith and so many times – not
always to be certain but more often than not – the pressures of
pluralism play a major role. In this context, they don't like the idea
that people they enjoy, people they trust and love,
people they like more than the Christians in their lives are portrayed as enemies of the church in general or - even worse - enemies of God. If Christianity as widely practiced appears to put us at odds with others we like then there must be something wrong with it.
As a former “other” talked about in
the McLaren article, I was on the receiving end of a fair amount of dislike
from the Christian community. In my wayward days, the overwhelming
majority of Christians in my life made it clear that (1) they
disapproved of me and (2) wrote me off for a bad guy to be kept at a
distance. They very rarely felt the need to dissuade me from the
path to hell – presuming they believed such a path was truly real -
and most often seemed comforted that I wouldn't be messing up their
heaven. There were exceptions but they were just that – exceptions.
I thought it was all nonsense anyway,
so I didn't spend much time fretting over it. I gave as good as I
got in the disapproval department, a point that is routinely glossed
over by those wringing their hands about how horribly Christians talk
about the “others.” The “others” are often neck deep in the
ugliness. Yet - no matter how profane and vitriolic their attacks
become - they are innocents naturally responding to judgement from
Christians. What else could they do except cuss and swear and make
abundant use of ad hominem attacks on every forum available to them
regardless of the age of the audience or the appropriateness of the
attacks given the context of the event? They feel judged so they are deemed perpetually innocent by our hand wringing brothers and sisters.
Ultimately, I changed my mind because evidence
persuaded me that Christianity is true. Not because I became
convinced that we can all work together without having to
change each other. Certainly not because I decided the differences
between us were unimportant. It was the simple recognition that what I observed to be true about the world fit most comfortable in a theistic and particularly a Christian worldview. I recognized this without any concern for whether or not I had good feelings about the people that claim to represent that worldview. In fact, I still didn't like Christians
for quite some time after I became one.
After a recent event in Hamilton, New Zealand
three young people stayed back to talk. A young woman asked, "I assume coming from outside the faith there was a period of adjustment where you felt weird?" I told her absolutely and her friend asked me how long it took me to get past
feeling like an outsider. My answer? I have never
stopped feeling like an outsider to some degree or another. My
belief in the truth of Christianity neither translated into an all
consuming comfort with church culture nor any desire on my part to become something I wasn't to please others. But so what? I understand
the reasons why I am a Christian and grasp the concept that those
reasons are not dependent on the behavior of any group of people or
that group's acceptance of other people. It simply is not a proper criteria
by which to judge the truth of the Christian claims. It is a proper
criteria to judge the individual Christians or church bodies, but it
fails to address the truth of the Christian worldview at all.
My own church has never taught us to
hate anyone, though our pastor does clearly state that behaviors like
premarital sex, adultery, dishonesty, homosexual sex, greed, and yes
the hatred of other people are all categorized sinful according to
biblical teaching. As a result, people who have been unfaithful to
their spouses, are sexually promiscuous, or identify themselves as
homosexuals expressed to me that they feel disliked or judged by
those messages. I explain that we must be able to separate evaluation of action
from personal hatred. Truly hateful attacks should not be accepted by
anyone and deserve broad ecumenical condemnation. However, simply identifying a
behavior as biblically sinful is only hate speech to the radically
sensitive who are desperate not just for tolerance but for universal
acceptance and approval. As has been pointed out numerous times before, in order to tolerate one another we must first disagree.
Students excited about Mr.
McLaren's message shared how they hoped that we could build our
collective faith on what we are for rather than what we are against.
I propose that we build our collective faith on what is true
and not stress so much about how we feel from moment to moment.
Emotions are unstable things. C.S. Lewis once talked about
marriage saying the love feelings can come and go but it is the commitment that binds
the couple. The commitment makes it possible to endure dry seasons and fall in love all
over again or remember the love that brought you together. In the
same way, a commitment to truth can carry you through confusing
emotionally trying spiritual struggles especially those set off by the ever confusing way that people of all sorts relate to one another.
Certainly we are emotional beings, but
when my heart waivers the total love of the Lord our God with all my
mind is still sufficient. What happens when we fail to emphasize the
importance of truth and the intellectual rigor of apologetics
arguments like the minimal facts of the resurrection of Jesus, the
cosmological arguments for the existence of God, the moral arguments
for the existence of God, arguments from consciousness, and textual
criticism affirming the reliability of the scriptures? Do we instead
encourage a faith built on deemphasizing what is particular about
Christian faith for the sake of getting along? If so, we cultivate
an environment that also deemphasizes the idea that the particulars
of the Christian faith are important at all. If that is the case,
then there is no longer any reason to remain a Christian.
To put it simply, if it isn't true then
it doesn't matter. If it is true, then how I feel about that fact is
less important than what that truth means to us all.
